Back to blog
General

Computer Vision vs Surveys: Which is Better?

8 min read
70%
of event memories are distorted after 48 hours
Kahneman, 'Thinking Fast and Slow'
12-18%
average post-event survey response rate
SurveyMonkey, 2024
87%
of purchase decisions are unconscious
Harvard Business Review, 2023

You organized a 2-day conference. Sent satisfaction survey to 800 attendees. Got 120 responses (15%). Of those, 80% said they "really enjoyed" the event. But when you ask the sponsor "How many people visited your booth?", the answer is... "Not sure, but people seemed interested."

The problem: Surveys capture what people think they felt, not what actually happened. And 70% of memories are distorted after 48 hours (Kahneman). You're making $500K decisions based on faulty perceptions.

Direct Comparison: Surveys vs. Computer Vision

Objective data beats subjective perception

AspectPost-Event SurveysComputer Vision
Accuracy
Subjective (perception)
Objective (95%+ accuracy)
Coverage Rate
12-18% respond
100% of attendees
Bias
High (memory + selection)
Minimal (raw data)
Timing
Days/weeks after event
Real-time (during event)
Actionable
Difficult (vague opinions)
Easy (specific metrics)
Comparable
Difficult (questions change)
Easy (same metrics)

Real Example: What People Say vs. What They Do

Survey responses vs. actual behavior

What the Survey Said

Question: "Which session did you enjoy most?"

Popular answer: "CEO Keynote on Innovation"

Question: "Did you visit Sponsor A's booth?"

Popular answer: "Yes, it was interesting"

Problem: Based on faulty memory and social desirability bias

What the Data Showed

CEO Keynote:

• 65% initial occupancy

• 40% left in first 15 min

• Retention rate: only 60%

Sponsor A Booth:

• 1,200 passersby

• 180 visitors (15% attraction)

• Avg time: 1.8 min (low)

Solution: Objective data reveals the truth

When to Use Each Approach

Surveys and computer vision are complementary, not exclusive

Use Surveys For:

  • Overall satisfaction: "Would you recommend this event?"
  • Qualitative feedback: "What can we improve?"
  • Future intentions: "Will you attend next year?"
  • Context: Understanding the "why" behind the numbers

Use Computer Vision For:

  • Objective metrics: "How many people visited?"
  • Real behavior: "How long did they stay?"
  • Comparisons: "Booth A vs. B - which performed better?"
  • Measurable ROI: Prove value with concrete data

Want to Replace Guesswork with Real Data?

See how computer vision captures objective behavior in real-time.

Computer vision technology captures these metrics automatically, in a fully privacy-compliant way. Learn more about event analytics applications.

Frequently Asked Questions

No, they're complementary. Computer vision measures WHAT happened (objective behavior). Surveys capture WHY (context, satisfaction, intentions). Use both: data for decisions, surveys for context.
12-18% is average because: (1) busy people don't respond, (2) only extremes respond (very satisfied or very dissatisfied), (3) survey fatigue, (4) lack of incentive. Result: biased sample that doesn't represent reality.
Captures behavior IN REAL-TIME, not after. Doesn't depend on human memory (70% distorted after 48h). Measures what actually happened, not what people think happened.
Yes, with caveats. Typical accuracy: 95%+ for counting, 90%+ for dwell time. Work with trends and patterns, not absolute numbers. Compare periods (before/after, day 1 vs. day 2) for actionable insights.
Use computer vision to IDENTIFY patterns (e.g., Booth A had 50% more visitors than B). Use surveys to UNDERSTAND why (e.g., ask Booth A visitors what attracted them). Data + context = better decisions.

Objective Data > Subjective Perceptions

Replace guesswork with real behavior

See Computer Vision in Action

Schedule a demonstration and see how to measure real behavior with 95%+ accuracy.

E

Eagle Sight AI

Computer Vision Specialists

Want to see these insights in practice?

Schedule a personalized demo and discover how computer vision can transform your business